• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

USC Department of Contracts and Grants

  • Home
    • Pre-Award Overview
    • Post-Award Overview
    • Subawards Overview
    • Explore DCG Resources
    • Feedback
    • Service Agreements
  • Pre-Award
    • Complete Proposal
    • Roles and Responsibilities
    • Find Funding
    • Review Funding
    • Compliance Requirements
    • Route in Cayuse SP
    • DCG Review
    • Sponsor Review
    • Post Submission
  • Post-Award
    • Roles and Responsibilities
    • Award Setup
    • Award Guidance
    • Outgoing Subawards
    • Progress Reports and Deliverables at USC
    • Award Closeout
  • Subawards
    • Defining Subawards
    • Outgoing Subawards at Proposal Stage
    • Setting Up and Modifying Outgoing Subawards
    • Monitoring of Subawards
    • DCG Contacts for Questions on Outgoing Subawards
    • Forms
  • DCG Training
    • Training for Principal Investigators
    • Training for Research Administrators
    • Training for Cayuse SP
    • MicroLearning Videos
  • Resources
    • General Guidance
    • Roles and Responsibilities Made Easy
    • Roles and Responsibilities in Research Administration
    • USC Policies and Training Programs
    • Common Forms and Templates
    • Sponsor Resources for Research Administrators
    • Notifications Regarding Federal Directives
    • USC Research Administration Navigator Use
    • USC Research Administration Navigator FAQ
    • Prompt Engineering for RA Navigator
  • Directory
You are here: Home / Announcements / Reviewing Writing Samples

Reviewing Writing Samples

August 24, 2023

Reminder: If you are new to writing grant applications, sometimes seeing how someone else has presented their idea can help as you are developing your own application. With the gracious permission of successful investigators, some institutes have provided samples of funded R01, R03, R15, R21, SBIR/STTR, K, and F applications, sharing plans, leadership plans, and more. They have even provided sample summary statements so you can know what to expect to receive as the outcome of the review of your application.

When referencing these resources, it is important to remember:

  • Proceed with Caution – These applications were developed using the forms and instructions that were in effect at the time of their submission and may not apply to the funding opportunity to which you are responding. Follow current application instructions and requirements included in the funding opportunity carefully.
  • Different Strokes – The best way to present your science may differ substantially from the approach taken by those who wrote the example applications. Seek feedback on your draft application from mentors and others.
  • Don’t Be Afraid to Reach Out – Talk to an NIH Program Officer in your area of science for advice about the best type of grant program and the Institute or Center that might be interested in your idea.
  • Get Scrappy – Samples are not available for all grant programs. Many programs have common elements, and the available samples can still provide helpful information.

Questions? If you have any questions about the above resource, feel free to reach out to your DCG Officer or post your question in our DCG Slack Channel.

Filed Under: Announcements

Department of Contracts and Grants
3720 S. Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0701

University of Southern California - Content managed by DCG
  • Privacy Notice - Notice of Non-Discrimination